Cases 1 - 10 of 443
Bowers v. Zurple, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers doing business as Eric Bowers Photo
Defendant:
Zurple, Inc. and Sharon G Aubuchon doing business as Kansas City Property Search
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Caldwell v. Bowers et al
as 6:2024cv06051
Plaintiff:
Samuel Walter Caldwell
Defendant:
Deputy Director Syrna Bowers, MEDICAL SERVICES MGR Dana Haynes, RN Kelly Aunspaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowers v. Connell
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers doing business as Eric Bowers Photo
Defendant:
James Connell doing business as A1 Healthy Homes
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Bowers v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Herbert Bowers
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bowers v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03862
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Bowers
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Bower v. ADC et al
as 4:2023cv01167
Plaintiff:
Richard Bower
Defendant:
ADC and Freddy Childs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Lehmer et al
as 4:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gomez
Defendant:
William Lehmer, Anne Buck-Kemp, Greg Grady and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eastman v. Maloch et al
as 6:2023cv06100
Plaintiff:
Ramon Dewayne Eastman, Sr.
Defendant:
Abigail R. Maloch, Warden White, Major Maclor Otts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bower-Smith v. BNSF Railway Company
as 7:2023cv05003
Plaintiff:
Colby Bower-Smith
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bowers v. Menard, Inc.
as 3:2023cv03020
Plaintiff:
James Bowers
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
