Cases 1 - 10 of 46
BOYER v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 3:2023cv00316
Petitioner:
FRANK BOYER
Respondent:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SOMERSET COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Boyer v. Amy Robey, et al
as 23-5655
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM LEE BOYER
Respondent / Appellee:
AMY ROBEY, Warden and DANIEL J. CAMERON, Attorney General
Boyer v. Robey et al
as 1:2022cv00061
Petitioner:
William L. Boyer
Respondent:
Amy Robey and Daniel Camron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reese v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2022cv00282
Petitioner:
Thomas Reese
Respondent:
Jim Sullivan and Linda Boyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Boyer v. Tedford
as 9:2021cv01284
Petitioner:
Daniel E. Boyer
Respondent:
Jeffrey Tedford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOYER v. DESANTIS
as 5:2021cv00208
Petitioner:
SHAWN M BOYER and SHAWN MICHAEL BOYER
Respondent:
RON DESANTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boyer v. Warden
as 3:2021cv00698
Petitioner:
Mark Steven Boyer and Mark S Boyer
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Batie-Bey v. Johnson County Court et al
as 1:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Christine Boyer, Dana Christiansen, Mark Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Trapayne C Batie-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyer v. McGinley et al
as 1:2019cv01835
Petitioner:
Donald Edward Boyer, Jr.
Respondent:
Thomas McGinley, PA State Attorney General and Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyer v. Fikes
as 0:2019cv02213
Petitioner:
Willie J. Boyer
Respondent:
Warden Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
