Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Kemp et al v. Bonobos, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00854
Plaintiff:
Darrell Kemp, Bradley S Cooper and Bradley Cooper
Defendant:
Bonobos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: The Weinstein Co Holdings
as 20-1750
Defendant / Appellee:
SPYGLASS MEDIA GROUP LLC, FKA Lantern Entertainment LLC
Debtor:
In re: WEINSTEIN CO HOLDINGS LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY COOPER
FISCHMAN v. SMITHERS et al
as 1:2019cv03202
Defendant:
MEGAN SMITHERS, BRADLEY COOPER, TRAVIS WOMPLER and others
Plaintiff:
INGER SHANAH FISCHMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv01290
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: The Weinstein Company Holdings
as 19-8010
Respondent:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, WEINSTEIN CO HOLDINGS LLC and SPYGLASS MEDIA GROUP LLC, FKA Lantern Entertainment LLC
Petitioner:
BRADLEY COOPER
Not Yet Classified:
In re: WEINSTEIN CO HOLDINGS LLC
Cooper v. 3M Company
as 6:2019cv00128
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff:
Bradley Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00242
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Guglielmo v. Montgomery County, Ohio and the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners et al
as 3:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Joseph Guglielmo
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Ohio and the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners, Phil Plummer, Matthew Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEDRICK v. CURRY et al
as 1:2015cv00292
Defendant:
DONNA BRICKER, KRISTIE BRICKER, RONALD BRICKER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HEDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
