Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ASBURY v. USA
as 1:2020cv00665
Petitioner:
BRIAN BRADFORD ASBURY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ASBURY v. USA
as 1:2017cv00009
Petitioner:
BRIAN BRADFORD ASBURY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Brian Asbury
as 16-4634
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRIAN BRADFORD ASBURY
JOHNSON et al v. BRADFORD et al
as 2:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
JAY H. JOHNSON and UNITED TOWING SERVICE, LLC
Defendant:
BRIAN BRADFORD and THE BOROUGH OF BRADDOCK HILLS, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burdick et al v. Stapler et al
as 1:2014cv01454
Plaintiff:
Matthew Burdick , Jamie Pinkstaff-Burdick and Candace Pinkstaff
Defendant:
Brian Bradford Stapler, New Prime Inc. , Prime Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walker Transport v. Daimler Trucks North America LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01451
Defendant:
Daimler Trucks North America LLC, Brian Bradford Stapler, New Prime Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Walker Transport
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Financial Federal Credit Union Inc. v. Bradford's Unlimited Land Service, LLC et al
as 1:2010mc00427
Plaintiff:
Financial Federal Credit Union Inc.
Defendant:
Bradford's Unlimited Land Service, LLC and Brian Bradford
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
WILLIAMS v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2010cv05120
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRIAN BRADFORD, WESTLEY DILKS, MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2010cv05043
Plaintiff:
WILLIE E. PATTERSON
Defendant:
BRIAN BRADFORD, WESTLEY DILKS, MS. MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2010cv05039
Plaintiff:
JAMAL JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN BRADFORD, WESTLEY DILKS, MS. MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
