Cases 1 - 10 of 17
BLACK v. PISTRO et al
as 5:2023cv00093
Petitioner:
GALEN FOSTER BLACK
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTRO, T EASTER, ED GONZALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lozon v. USA
as 2:2022cv00039
Petitioner:
Brian Rose Quil-Quil-Poo Lozon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROSE v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04419
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ROSE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. James et al
as 3:2021cv04651
Plaintiff:
Jordan Davis
Defendant:
Contra Costa County, Nicole Martinez, Brian Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rose v. ComfyFeet, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2020cv00649
Plaintiff:
Brian Rose
Defendant:
Keith Eickhoff and ComfyFeet, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young America's Foundation et al v. Stenger et al
as 3:2020cv00822
Defendant:
College Progressives, Student Association of Binghamton University, John Pelletier and others
Plaintiff:
Young America's Foundation, Binghamton University College Republicans and Jon Lizak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Brian Lozon
as 20-30119
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN QUILLY LOZON, AKA Brian Rose Quil-Quil-Poo Lozon
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sheila Eyajan v. State of Ohio, et al
as 19-3716
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY RIPMA, Ashtabula Public Defender, FORENSIC PSYCHIATRIC CENTER OF NORTHEAST OHIO INC, KIM KOSKI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
EYAJAN v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2019cv00161
Defendant:
KIM KOSKI, GERALD L. HEINBAUGH, MARY SPRINGER and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA M. EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ransone-Bey v. Rose et al
as 2:2016cv01569
Plaintiff:
Cee Justice Ransone-Bey
Defendant:
Brian Rose, Zachary Brubaker, Patrick Sobczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
