Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01217
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ward v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2026cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brian Ward
Defendant:
Social Security Adminstration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BURGER v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2025cv07234
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WARD BURGER
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURGER v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 3:2025cv14604
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WARD BURGER
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURGER v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2025cv14604
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WARD BURGER
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURGER v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as NJ/3:25-cv-14604
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WARD BURGER
WARD v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2025cv00930
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WARD
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ROBERT F KENNEDY, JR, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. United States of America
as 1:2025cv00701
Petitioner:
Kevin Brian Ward
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WARD v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2025cv03103
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WARD
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
