Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 26,450
Zimmerman v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff: Matthew Ivan Zimmerman
Defendant: Sheriff Bryan Thomas, Chaplain Richard Ashford, Chief FNU Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. Kylm
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff: Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant: Arthur D Kylm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramon Caldwell v. Bryan Morrison
as 24-1376
Petitioner: RAMON CALDWELL
Respondent: BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Nancy Hooks v. City of Warren, MI, et al
as 24-1375
Plaintiff: NANCY HOOKS
Defendant: CITY OF WARREN, MI, POLICE OFFICER LUCAS DOE, POLICE OFFICER BRYAN MUNAFO and others
United States v. Jimenez
as 24-2075
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BRYAN G. JIMENEZ
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Bryan Wayne Thomas
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
State of California, et al. v. United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms & Explosives, et al.
as 24-2701
Plaintiff: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BRYAN MUEHLBERGER, FRANK BLACKWELL and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, STEVEN DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as Director of ATF, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Baughman v. Bowman
as 24-40286
Plaintiff: Steven Kurt Baughman
Defendant: Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Vernon Mitchel, Assitant Warden, Powledge Unit, Ronnie Stanhope, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01550
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
White v. Stirling
as 0:2024cv02595
Petitioner: Gary A. White, Jr.
Respondent: Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?