Cases 1 - 10 of 791
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy of Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Burroughs v. Wells Fargo Mortgage
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William S. Burroughs
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURROUGHS v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv04290
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA BURROUGHS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-717
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Approx. $1,697,930.94 seized from River City Bank Account et al
as 2:2024at00217
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $1,697,930.94 seized from River City Bank Account and Approximately $230,000.00 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account
Claimant:
Daniel Stewart and Luke Burroughs
USA v. Approx. $1,697,930.94, et al.,
as 2:2024mc00090
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $1,697,930.94 seized from River City Bank Account and Approximately $230,000.00 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account
Claimant:
Daniel Stewart and Luke Burroughs
Jones v. Edmonds et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo L. Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney Edmonds, U.S. Attorney Williams, Det. Slater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Terrell v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Eli Terrell, Armando Aguilar, Michael Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
