Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barley v. Education Plus Corporation
as 3:2026cv01493
Defendant:
Emmanuel Argiros, Cindy Argiros, Roxanne Losicco and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Barley
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FISHER v. DINGLE
as 2:2026cv05096
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. FISHER, SR.
Defendant:
CAITLIN DINGLE
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
v. Dingle
as 2:2026cv05095
Defendant:
Caitlin Dingle
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Lewis v. Wake County, North Carolina et al
as 5:2026ct03196
Plaintiff:
Sara A Lewis
Defendant:
Wake County, North Carolina, Willie Rowe, Gene Dail Butler, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Wake County, North Carolina et al
as 5:2026cv00453
Plaintiff:
Sara A Lewis
Defendant:
Wake County, North Carolina, Willie Rowe, Gene Dail Butler, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dingle v. SSA
as 3:2026cv00904
Plaintiff:
Nykole R. Dingle
Defendant:
SSA
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clifton Dingle v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
as 2:2026cv06849
Plaintiff:
Clifton Dingle
Defendant:
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dingle v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 6:2026cv01521
Plaintiff:
Eugene Dingle
Defendant:
South Carolina Child Support Enforcement Division, Greenville County Sheriff's Office, Greenville County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
