Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Daye v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company et al
as 6:2026cv00798
Plaintiff:
Jaime Daye
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Gerber Products Company, Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith-Daye v. Dutchess County
as 1:2026cv02274
Plaintiff:
David Smith-Daye
Defendant:
Dutchess County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daye v. Hudson
as 4:2026cv00145
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Daye
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Daye vs. BJ's Wholesale Club Inc.
as 1:2026cv01488
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE DAYE
Defendant:
BJ's Wholesale Club Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
David Meyers v. A. Duncan
as 26-6308
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
A. DUNCAN, Assistant Warden, D. ANDERSON, Warden, ALL ROSP HEARINGS OFFICERS and others
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 7:2026cv00126
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
A. Duncan, D. Anderson, All ROSP Hearings Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daye North America, Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2025cv00630
Plaintiff:
Daye North America, Inc.
Defendant:
United States, United States Customs and Border Protection and Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Daye v. Jaheed et al
as 1:2025cv03962
Plaintiff:
Reginald Daye
Defendant:
Medical Provider Dr. Jaheed, Dr. Thomas, Ann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Daye v. Roling et al
as 4:2025cv00366
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Daye
Defendant:
Jordan Roling, Kimberly Graham, Linda Zanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAYE v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2025cv00905
Petitioner:
DEVIN R. DAYE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
