Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Davis v. Gubster et al
as 1:2026cv08841
Plaintiff: Mitchell Brian Davis
Defendant: Jane Gubster, Thomas Dart, Collins and others
: Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralls, III v. Chapman et al
as 2:2026cv00104
Plaintiff: Martin Edward Ralls, III
Defendant: Judge Charles Chapman, Sheriff Jerry Wayne Mosely and Macy Torrey
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Collins et al
as 2:2026cv04481
Plaintiff: Jordan Randolph
Defendant: John B Collins, John J Toomey, Jennifer A Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv02080
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCDANIEL v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORD ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2026cv02619
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER S MCDANIEL
Defendant: NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORD ADMINISTRATION and EDWARD C. FORST
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Larry Luong v. Edward Ellin-Carrillo
as 3:2026cv04217
Plaintiff: Larry Luong
Respondent: Edward Ellin-Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jordan v. Wren et al
as 4:2026cv00101
Plaintiff: Charles Edward Jordan, Jr.
Defendant: Superintendent Sequeia Wren, Mike Dixon, Commissioner Burl Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02243
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00511
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pizzano v. Walsh et al
as 3:2026cv02063
Plaintiff: Felicity York Pizzano
Defendant: Edward T. Walsh, Vanluvender and Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?