Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Stewart v. VA Medical Center, et al
as 4:2022cv04683
Plaintiff:
William-Bullock Stewart
Defendant:
VA Medical Center, Eric L. Dwight-Gilroy, Dale L. Jamison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holton v. Sage
as 4:2022cv00514
Petitioner:
Ruben C. Holton
Respondent:
Warden J. Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Holton v. Sage
as 4:2022cv00212
Petitioner:
Ruben C. Holton
Respondent:
Warden J. Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Holton v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Ruben C. Holton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Black Tie Title, LLC v. Holton Wise Community Redevelopment Fund LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01014
Defendant:
Holton Wise Community Redevelopment Fund LLC doing business as Holton-Wise Property Group, John C. Holton and James P. Wise
Plaintiff:
Black Tie Title, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Raoul Lafond v. Richard Glaser, Jr.
as 21-6177
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD S. GLASER, JR., LYNNE P. KLAUER, WALTER C. HOLTON, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAOUL LAFOND
Holton v. Finley
as 1:2020cv01740
Petitioner:
Ruben C. Holton
Respondent:
Warden Scott Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richardson v. Jacksonville Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2020cv00771
Defendant:
R. C. Holton, A. S. Franz, J. L. Eanes and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAFOND v. GLASER et al
as 1:2020cv00557
Defendant:
CLIFTON T. BARRETT, RICHARD S. GLASER, JR., WALTER C. HOLTON, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
RAOUL LAFOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bueno v. Chang et al
as 2:2016cv03450
Plaintiff:
Ramon Luna Bueno
Defendant:
J Chang, C Holton, C Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
