Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 76
JACKSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv00791
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff: C. WEBB JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
John Smith v. Inder Gujral We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-6268
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN KEITH SMITH
Defendant: C. WEBB and WANDA ROLLINS
Defendant / Appellee: DOCTOR INDER JEET SINGH GUJRAL
Webb v. Otey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01410
Plaintiff: Aaron C. Webb
Defendant: Aaron Vondergraph, Chris Otey, Cody Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Bolick
as 3:2018cv00324
Plaintiff: Joshua C. Webb
Defendant: Robert A Bolick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Webb v. McCray
as 3:2018cv00326
Plaintiff: Joshua C. Webb
Defendant: Shawn McCray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Webb v. Beck
as 3:2018cv00319
Plaintiff: Joshua C. Webb
Defendant: Christopher Beck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Webb v. Shaw
as 3:2018cv00296
Plaintiff: Joshua C. Webb
Defendant: Kenneth Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Ari Bailey, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1956
Petitioner: In re: ARI BAILEY
Respondent: HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DELBERT G. SAUERS and others
Nominal Respondent: RICHARD P. CONABOY
Chavis v. Kirkpatrick
as 18-854
Plaintiff - Appellant: George Chavis
Defendant - Appellee: M. Kirkpatrick, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Christopher Miller, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Susan Peacock, Deputy Superintendent of Administration, Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00479
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?