Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bates v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv01197
Plaintiff: Danielle Bates
Defendant: Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00390
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Null et al v. Nessel et al
as 1:2026cv02587
Defendant: Timothy Bates, Dana Nessel, Gregory Townsend and others
Plaintiff: Michael John Null and William Grant Null
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sack v. Summit County et al
as 1:2026cv04291
Plaintiff: Guy R. Sack
Defendant: Summit County, Colorado, Town of Frisco, Colorado, Summit Fire & EMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bates v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv10331
Plaintiff: Aaron Bates
Defendant: Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Bates v. Ford et al
as 5:2026cv00252
Plaintiff: Timothy Bates
Defendant: Christopher Ford, Shane Spurlock, Dylan Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05157
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hibbert v. Union County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2026cv00428
Plaintiff: Emily Ann Hibbert
Defendant: Union County, Tennessee, William F Breeding, II, Jeremy Meltabarger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gustus v. County et al
as 1:2026cv00251
Plaintiff: Angela Gustus
Defendant: Hamilton County, Austin Garrett, QCHC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2026cv01856
Plaintiff: Jeremiah Joseph Watkins
Defendant: Clackamas County, Nate Ariel, Trevor Lee Isherwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?