Cases 11 - 20 of 23
LAPUMA v. COUCH et al
as 4:2016cv00799
Plaintiff:
PERRY T LAPUMA
Defendant:
J COUCH, K LIGHTFOOT, C SIMCOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. BB&T CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00841
Plaintiff:
BREWSTER SMITH, JR , DORIS KIROUAC , CHRISTINA HAWKS and others
Defendant:
BB&T CORPORATION , BB&T CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE , BB&T CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOWERS et al v. BB&T CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00732
Plaintiff:
BURKE BOWERS , ROBERT SIMS , ERIK GAVIDIA and others
Defendant:
BB&T CORPORATION, BB&T CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE, BB&T CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Green v. Hafen et al
as 2:2014cv01190
Defendant:
T. Best, J. Campbell, Conrad Hafen and others
Plaintiff:
Malique Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jerome M. Jenkins , Lacathy C. Kendrick and Teresa G. Moultrie
Defendant:
Chuck Smith , Meriwether County Sheriff's Office and Meriwether County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendrick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2011cv00209
Plaintiff:
Randy C Kendrick
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wing v. Kendrick et al
as 2:2008cv01002
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Wing and Robert G. Wing
Defendant:
Brad B. Kendrick, Amy C. Kendrick and ABDF
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Nolan Kendrick
as 08-4267
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NOLAN C. KENDRICK
USA v. Nolan Kendrick
as 08-4269
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NOLAN C. KENDRICK
USA v. Nolan Kendrick
as 08-4270
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NOLAN C. KENDRICK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
