Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Brown v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Janeen Brown
Defendant:
City of Chicago, M Lopez and C McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McCoy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Noah C. McCoy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Whitley et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02479
Plaintiff:
Shaereian N Whitley, Esmeralda Lucio, Amanda Ramos and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCCOY v. THOR MOTOR COACH, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv01589
Plaintiff:
JAMES C MCCOY
Defendant:
THOR MOTOR COACH, INC. and FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
McCoy v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Charles C. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McCoy v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel C. McCoy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCOY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99660
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Antonelli et al
as 6:2019cv03036
Defendant:
Jane Doe, T Graves, B M Antonelli and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2019cv02569
Plaintiff:
MARCUS R. FREEMAN and MARCELLUS R. FREEMAN
Defendant:
REGGIE B. WALTON, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, CHANNING D. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCoy v. United States of America
as 19-2817
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robert C. McCoy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
