Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Elmer et al
as 6:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Sue Torrez, Unknown Purvis, Norris Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Eunicholas E Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZUFFA, LLC v. Gypsy Moon Vapors, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv62128
Defendant:
Gypsy Moon Vapors, Inc., Tina M. Oakes and Ronald C. Oakes
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Oaks v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv02896
Plaintiff:
Sylvia C. Oaks
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Culliver et al
as 4:2011cv02074
Plaintiff:
Larry Edward Jackson
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Derrick Hines, Davis S Wise and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Brien v. Talley et al
as 4:2011cv01860
Plaintiff:
William Michael O'Brien, Jr
Defendant:
William Talley, Dr. Hood, Dr. Crocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oaks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2010cv02054
Plaintiff:
Edwin C. Oaks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
OAKS v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv88833
Plaintiff:
TONY C. OAKS
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
OAKS v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv90415
Plaintiff:
TONY C. OAKS and TONY C. OAKS
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
