Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Liptok v. City of Pottsville, PA, et al
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
John J. Liptok
Defendant:
City Of Pottsville Pa., et al, City Council, Dorothy Botto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIPTOK v. CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL
as 2:2023cv02942
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LIPTOK
Defendant:
CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL, CITY COUNCIL, DOROTHY BOTTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Walker v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv07208
Plaintiff:
Trendell Walker
Defendant:
United States of America, Breon Peace, James H. Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Walker v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv03864
Plaintiff:
Trendell Walker
Defendant:
United States of America, Christopher C. Caffarone, Mark E. Misorek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Palmer et al v. All Star Motors of Denham Springs, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00358
Plaintiff:
Tammy C. Palmer and Reggie L. Palmer
Defendant:
All Star Motors of Denham Springs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv03410
Plaintiff:
Pamela C. Palmer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hammock v. Watts et al
as 8:2019cv03575
Defendant:
Renardo Whitehead, Malik Mungo, Director Gail Watts and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Edward Hammock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
