Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Murzike v. McKinney et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff: James T. Murzike
Defendant: B. McKinney, Officer Burnette, Secules and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Pittman et al
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff: James T. Murzike
Defendant: C. Pittman and Ms. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Pittman
as 3:2023cv01496
Plaintiff: James T. Murzike
Defendant: C. Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PITTMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07381
Plaintiff: ROBERT C PITTMAN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PITTMAN v. MOUNTAIN SURGERY CENTER et al
as 2:2023cv08511
Plaintiff: SCOT C PITTMAN
Defendant: MOUNTAIN SURGERY CENTER, DOE DESIGNEE, 1 and DOE DESIGNEE, 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Pittman et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq02129
Special Master: Randi Ellis
Plaintiff: Timothy C. Pittman and Bobbie A. Pittman
Defendant: Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Daniel Rudd v. Gregory Pittman
as 21-1354
Defendant / Appellee: GREGORY C. PITTMAN, Judge
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL WILLIAM RUDD
Nesbitt v. Cumpagna et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2020cv04193
Defendant: Mr. M. Chartier, Sergeant Francis, Capt. Pendergrass and others
Plaintiff: Brian Keith Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03009
Plaintiff: Michael C Pittman
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Rudd v. Pittman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00027
Defendant: Gregory C. Pittman
Plaintiff: Daniel William Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?