Cases 31 - 40 of 1,813
Smith v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2023cv00142
Petitioner:
Franklin C. Smith
Respondent:
Social Security Administration, Supervisor Andrew and Go2Bank Customer Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv16229
Plaintiff:
Gary Lewis
Defendant:
City of Chicago, D Prothro, C Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Sheridan Chief of Police et al
as 2:2023cv00223
Respondent:
Sheriff of Sheridan County Jail, Sheridan Chief of Police, Levi Dominguez and others
Petitioner:
Franklin C Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Deric C Smith, Sr
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Weinstein et al
as 1:2023cv09540
Plaintiff:
Austin C Smith
Defendant:
Michael B Wolk, adam shaw, Boaz R. Weinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Susan C Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hicks v. Cams Management Oakdale Green HOA et al
as 3:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
Eugene D Hicks
Defendant:
Cams Management Oakdale Green HOA, Douglas French, Georgia Young and others
Timothy SmithIn re: Timothy Smith
as 23-2783
Petitioner:
In re: TIMOTHY C. SMITH
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY JEFFERSON COUNTY
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv24613
Plaintiff:
PARNELL C SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
