Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Herndon #136007 v. Traylor et al
as 1:2021cv00470
Plaintiff:
Clarence Watson Herndon #136007
Defendant:
John Davids, David Maranka and C. Traylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor #940436 v. Yuhas et al
as 1:2021cv00435
Defendant:
Unknown Bookie, Katie Minard, David Maranka and others
Plaintiff:
Davariol Marquavis Taylor #940436
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George #243589 v. Washington et al
as 1:2021cv00391
Defendant:
Trent Hengesbach, David Huyge, C. Traylor and others
Plaintiff:
Bobie George #243589
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Traylor v. DEA Agent
as 5:2021cv00005
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Traylor, Jr.
Defendant:
DEA Agent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Herndon #136007 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01091
Defendant:
Nicole Doolittle, Joanne Bridgford, Brooke Oversmith and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Watson Herndon #136007
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
August v. P S C Industrial Outsourcing L P
as 6:2017cv00601
Defendant:
P S C Industrial Outsourcing L P
Plaintiff:
Mtisha August , Harry Booker , Laddy Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
IN RE: CAMDEN POLICE CASES
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
ALANDA FORREST , JEFFREY HICKS , FRANK SHAW and others
Defendant:
KEVIN PARRY, JASON STETSER, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TRAYLOR v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00891
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. TRAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN , CITY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY , CAMDEN CITY POLICE OFFICER JASON STETSER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mary C. Traylor v. A.o. Smith, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-79218
Defendant:
A.o. Smith
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Traylor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
