Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Wullschleger et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
as 3:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Laura C. Wullschleger and Michael C. Wilk
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Wilkes et al v. SouthState Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv01779
Plaintiff:
Todd C. Wilkes and Molly Wilkes
Defendant:
SouthState Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
United States of America v. Wilks et al
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Roger C. Wilks and Debra K. Wilks
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Wilkes v. Cargill, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Wilkes
Defendant:
Cargill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Wilkes v. Saul
as 1:2020cv05019
Defendant:
Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Amy C. Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MBW Investments II, LLC et al v. Aloha Global, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00899
Defendant:
Judy P. Ramos, Andres F. Babero, Theodore C. Wilkes and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew W. Weber and MBW Investments II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilks v. Schmidt et al
as 2:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Clarence C Wilks
Defendant:
Richard R Schmidt , Captain Dobson, Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Wilkes
as 5:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Diaz Chavez
Defendant:
Christopher C. Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Lorensen
as 3:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Diaz Chavez
Defendant:
Michael D. Lorensen
Consol_defendant:
Edwards, Stephen Andrew Arnold, Gregory Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United HealthCare Choice Plus Plan v. Abercrombie et al
as 3:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
United HealthCare Choice Plus Plan
Defendant:
Albert Abercrombie and Van C. Wilks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
