Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Donald Stout v. Preston County Sheriff's Department
as 21-7231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD CARL STOUT
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF DANIEL LOUGHRIE, DEPUTY RANDY STOCKETT and others
Stout v. Preston County Sherriff (sic) Department et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Officer Okin, Deputy Randy Stocket, Sherriff Daniel Loughrie and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Carl Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Preston County Sherriff (sic) Department et al
as 3:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Sherriff (sic) Daniel Loughrie, Officer Okin, Deputy Randy Stocket and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Carl Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Sherrill et al
as 5:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Kenneth F Davis
Defendant:
Jarred Sherrill , Nicola Kelly , Vineshia Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radford v. Brooks et al
as 5:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
V Brooks, Cindella Wooten, Erica Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Burl et al
as 5:2016cv00320
Plaintiff:
Rodney Williams
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Andrea Fitzpatrick, Carl Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Burl et al
as 5:2016cv00191
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Muhammad Jones
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Aundrea F Fitzgerald, Latoya Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. STOUT et al
as 3:2014cv07699
Plaintiff:
LARRY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CARL STOUT, ANTHONY ANDERSON, II, LISA JANTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. STOUT et al
as 3:2014cv07388
Plaintiff:
LARRY O. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CARL STOUT, ANTHONY ANDERSON, II, LISA JANTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsey v. Newton et al
as 4:2011cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ramsey
Defendant:
Jennifer Newton, Lewis Young, LaShundria Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
