Cases 1 - 10 of 438
Harrison v. Humana, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Carlton Harrison
Defendant:
Humana, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Parks v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Carlton B Parks
Defendant:
United States of America, Jeffrey S. Sutton, Travis R. McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Skoda v. Gorman et al.
as 1:2023cv02416
Plaintiff:
James Skoda
Defendant:
Christopher M. Gorman, Alexander M. Cutler, H. James Dallas and others
Shelley v. Davidson County Criminal Courts et al
as 3:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Carlton J. Shelley
Defendant:
Davidson County Criminal Courts and Davidson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bushansky v. Gorman et al.
as 1:2023cv02257
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Christopher M. Gorman, Alexander M. Cutler, H. James Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Williams #674078 v. Frank et al
as 1:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Carlton Williams #674078
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2, Unknown Party #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carlton Watkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gainey v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02327
Plaintiff:
CARLTON GAINEY
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
Carlton Edwards
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Damian Carlton v. Chae Harris
as 23-3594
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAMIAN CARLTON
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAE HARRIS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
