Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rice et al v. Textron Aviation Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11596
Defendant:
Textron Aviation Inc. , Continental Motors, Inc. , RAM Aircraft, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Rice and Carol Rice
Mediator:
Judith G. Dein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCaughtry et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv27080
Plaintiff:
Tammy McCaughtry , Linda Pannone , Teresa Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCaughtry, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TAMMY MCCAUGHTRY, TERESA MITCHELL, MICHELE MIXON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. McCaughtry, et al
as 13-608
Petitioner:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Respondent:
TAMMY MCCAUGHTRY, LINDA PANNONE, TERESA MITCHELL and others
Pugh et al v. South Carolina Department of Probation Pardon and Parole Services et al
as 2:2013cv02431
Plaintiff:
Haley Pugh and Ellinor Bates
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Probation Pardon and Parole Services, Kescia Holmes, Larry Weeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCaughtry et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as OKW/5:13-cv-00839
Plaintiff:
Tammy McCaughtry , Linda Pannone , Teresa Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
McCaughtry et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00839
Plaintiff:
Tammy McCaughtry , Linda Pannone , Teresa Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Voyles v. Rice et al
as 1:2012cv03146
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Voyles
Defendant:
Carol Rice , Karen Walters , The Dayrunners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-1198
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
