Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Butler v. Eddy et al.
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Benjanell Butler, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Andrew Eddy, David Caudill and Landon Kohls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caudill #479314 v. Morrow et al
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lee Caudill #479314
Defendant:
Unknown Morrow, Unknown Nevins and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caudill v. Walmart Stores East, LP
as 5:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Annette Caudill
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP doing business as Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Grace Wilson Marshall v. Benjamin Caudill, et al
as 23-5938
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRACE L. WILSON MARSHALL
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN RYAN CAUDILL, VALERIE SCHROEDER KERSHAW, JENNIFER HALL CAUDILL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Adams et al vs 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00082
Defendant:
Network Supply, 3M Company, American Optical Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Adams, Alice Adams, Edward Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Wilson Marshall v. Caudill
as 5:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Grace L. Wilson Marshall
Defendant:
Benjamin Ryan Caudill, Valerie Kershaw, Jennifer Hall(Caudill) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James Eakes v. John Caudill
as 23-5255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EAKES
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN L. CAUDILL, Esq, In his Inidividual and his professional capacity
Brian Adams, et al v. 3M Company
as 23-5232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES, et al.
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
