Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Curry v. T.V. Spotlight News Channel et al
as 1:2016cv03368
Plaintiff:
Pamela Ann Curry
Defendant:
T.V. Spotlight News Channel, Channel Fox 5 News, Channel 4 New's and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Tsarnaev
as 16-6001
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV, a/k/a Jahar Tsarni
Interested Party:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOSTON GLOBE MEDIA PARTNERS, LLC, TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY, d/b/a WBUR-FM and others
Fernando Fontanez v. Time Warner Cable, et al
as 15-2572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO FONTANEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
TIME WARNER CABLE, CBS NEWS, OLGA VILLAREAL and others
Hephzibah Bates v. CBS New
as 15-1612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEPHZIBAH BATES
Defendant - Appellee:
CBS NEWS
Maxey v. KCRA Television Inc., et al
as 2:2015cv01095
Plaintiff:
James C. Maxey
Defendant:
KCRA Television, Inc., KXTV Television, Inc., KOVR Television, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontanez v. Time Warner Cable et al
as 2:2015cv00525
Plaintiff:
Fernando Fontanez
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable, CBS News, Olga Villareal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. Nett et al
as 5:2014cv00983
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks, Spence Taylor and John Michael
Defendant:
Elizabeth Nett, Ralph Shrader, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. CBS News
as 3:2014cv00165
Plaintiff:
Hephzibah Bates
Defendant:
CBS News
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maxey v. CBS News and Entertainment
as 2:2014cv00251
Plaintiff:
James C. Maxey
Defendant:
CBS News and Entertainment
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LaHodny v. 48 Hours et al
as 6:2013cv02102
Defendant:
48 Hours, CBS News, Mike Flick and others
Plaintiff:
Jeanne M. (Lyon) LaHodny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
