Cases 1 - 10 of 100
AIG Specialty Insurance Company et al v. CDK Global, LLC
as 1:2026cv08786
Plaintiff:
AIG Specialty Insurance Company and AIG Insurance Company of Canada
Defendant:
CDK Global, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
EUROBAHN LLC v. CDK GLOBAL LLC
as 1:2026cv00691
Plaintiff:
EUROBAHN LLC
Defendant:
CDK GLOBAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA v. CDK GLOBAL LLC
as 2:2026cv07411
Plaintiff:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CDK GLOBAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tekion Corp. v. CDK Global, LLC
as 1:2026cv03231
Plaintiff:
Tekion Corp.
Defendant:
CDK Global, LLC
Petitioner:
Dealertrack, Inc.
Cause Of Action: FRCP 37(a) Motion to compel deposition testimony
Tekion Corp. v. CDK Global, LLC
as 1:2026mi00095
Plaintiff:
Tekion Corp.
Defendant:
CDK Global, LLC
Petitioner:
Dealertrack, Inc.
Cause Of Action: FRCP 37(a) Motion to compel deposition testimony
Tekion Corp. v. CDK Global, LLC
as 6:2026mc09001
Plaintiff:
Tekion Corp.
Defendant:
CDK Global, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Tekion Corp. v. CDK Global, LLC
as 3:2026mc00006
Interested Party:
Reynolds & Reynolds Company
Plaintiff:
Tekion Corp.
Defendant:
CDK Global, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
PROQUOTES, INC. v. CDK GLOBAL, LLC
as 2:2025cv16914
Plaintiff:
PROQUOTES, INC.
Defendant:
CDK GLOBAL, LLC
Counter-Claimant:
CDK GLOBAL, LLC
Counter-Defendant:
PROQUOTES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
