Cases 1 - 10 of 4,691
Lee v. City of Brownsville et al
as 1:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
Andrew Terrell Lee
Defendant:
City of Brownsville, Haywood County, Billy H. Garrett, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mozee v. Chandler et al
as 5:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Patrick O Mozee
Defendant:
Nathan Chandler and Jennifer Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ring v. Chandler, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Nancy Ring
Defendant:
Chandler, City of, Kristoffer Buchanan, Samuel Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Lt. Chandler et al
as 0:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
David Tyran Johnson
Defendant:
Lt. Chandler, Sgt. Calex, SCDC Security Threat Group Intelligence Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mata v. State of Arizona
as 3:2024cv50183
Defendant:
State of Arizona and City of Chandler
Plaintiff:
Christian Mata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Antion M. Long, Jarred L Phillips, Shamar Singletary and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Baysore
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Tristan Chandler Stevens
Defendant:
Warden Baysore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Robert Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Christian Mata v. Amazon.com Services LLC, et al
as 24-1442
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN MATA
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC and INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHANDLER ARIZONA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
