Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Charles Brown, Jr. v. Georgia Department of Public Safety, et al
as 23-11096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES BROWN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, R. SCHOFILL and SHIVER
BROWN v. SCHOFILL
as 5:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BROWN, JR., R SCHOFILL and Officer SHIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Georgia Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2022cv01267
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Public Safety, Officer R. Schofill and Officer Shiver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Charles Brown, Jr.
as 22-10485
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES BROWN, JR.
Durden v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2021cv00441
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company, Patrice Margaret Brown and Robert Charles Brown, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael Durden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown, Jr. et al v. Woodhaven,City of et al
as 2:2014cv13332
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown, Jr. and Rachel Tompkins
Defendant:
Woodhaven, City of , Frank Zdankiewicz and Dennis Deweese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Charles Brown, Jr.
as 12-4952
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES BROWN, JR.
Ezzie McIntyre v. County of Centre, et al
as 10-3092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EZZIE MCINTYRE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF CENTRE, KAREN ARNOLD and CHARLES BROWN, JR., Judge
Fitzgerald v. Bellino et al
as 3:2010cv00667
Petitioner:
Darlene M. Fitzgerald
Respondent:
John Bellino, Cathy Stamets, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McIntyre v. Centre County et al
as 3:2009cv02014
Plaintiff:
Ezzie McIntyre
Defendant:
Centre County, Karen Arnold and Charles Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
