Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
English v. Rodovich We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00260
Defendant: Andrew P Rodovich Officer of the Court doing business as Federal Magistrate, United States District Court, Philip P. Simon and others
Plaintiff: Michael Dwayne English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EWINGS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv21806
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES EWINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks et al v. City of Atlanta, Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv03946
Plaintiff: Demetria Wideman, Erica Banks, Jessica Washington and others
Defendant: Charles Ewing and City of Atlanta, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaheed v. The City of New York
as 19-90
Defendant: Police Officer William Morris, James Doe, New York City Police Detective (fictitious name); in an individual and official capacity, Police Commissioner James O'Neill and others
Defendant / Appellee: Paul Bliss, New York City Police Officer; in an individual and official capacity, Jonathan Rodriguez, New York City Police Officer; in an individual and official capacity, Lydia Figueroa, New York City Police Officer; in an individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Daghrib Shaheed
Plaintiff: Waheedah Shaheed
Shaheed v. City of New York
as 19-94
Defendant: Police Officer William Morris, James Doe, New York City Police Detective (fictitious name); in an individual and official capacity, Police Officer Edward Birmingham, in an individual and official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee: Paul Bliss, New York City Police Officer; in an individual and official capacity, Jonathan Rodriguez, New York City Police Officer; in an individual and official capacity, Lydia Figueroa, New York City Police Officer; in an individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Waheedah Shaheed
Ewing et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv17615
Plaintiff: Louise Ewing and Lawrence Charles Ewing, Sr.
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ewing et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv15194
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Ewing and Charles Ewing
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ewing et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-15194
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Ewing and Charles Ewing
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
Garrett, et al v. Cook, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2214
Plaintiff - Appellee: SCOTT GARRETT and PAMELA JANE GARRETT
Plaintiff: WHEELER PEAK CONSULTING, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: DANIEL W. COOK, individually and as a member of the Board of Directors of Trenchless Infrastructure Technolologies, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: WELLS FARGO BANK NEW MEXICO, N.A., successor to Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico and WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Defendant: CATHERINE F. DAVIS, TRENCHLESS INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES INC., FKA Hydroscope Group Inc., AKA Hydroscope Integrated Technologies, Inc. A Nevada Corporation, KENNETH A. HUNT, individually and others
Garrett, et al v. Cook, et al
as 10-2207
Plaintiff - Appellee: SCOTT GARRETT, PAMELA JANE GARRETT and WHEELER PEAK CONSULTING, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: DANIEL W. COOK, individually and as a member of the Board of Directors of Trenchless Infrastructure Technolologies, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: WELLS FARGO BANK NEW MEXICO, N.A., successor to Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico and WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Defendant: TRENCHLESS INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES INC., FKA Hydroscope Group Inc., AKA Hydroscope Integrated Technologies, Inc. A Nevada Corporation, YOLANDA COOK, individually, WILLIAM F. HARTMAN, Dr., as a member of the Board of Directors of Trenchless Infrastructure Technologies, Inc. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?