Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 217
Bostice v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Bostice
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kettering (PS) v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2023cv02951
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Kettering
Defendant: No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Davis et al
as 5:2023cv06136
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Miller
Defendant: Tim Davis and Gentry County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locke v. Hacker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01001
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Locke
Defendant: Denease Hacker and Mark Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levan v. Armstrong We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00057
Petitioner: Charles Lee Levan, Jr.
Respondent: Bruce Armstrong and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Charles Avery
as 22-7179
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CHARLES LEE AVERY
Richards v. Thom et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv05031
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Richards, Jr.
Defendant: Kevin Thom and Commander Mr. Yantis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyner v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02192
Petitioner: Charles Lee Joyner
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Avery v. USA
as 3:2022cv00182
Petitioner: Charles Lee Avery
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mosier v. Lumpkin
as 22-10105
Petitioner / Appellant: Charles Lee Mosier, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?