Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SHIELDS v. MCGINELY et al
as 2:2017cv05241
Petitioner:
CHARLES SHIELDS
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINELY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF _____________ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shields v. Delta Rigging & Tools, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00219
Plaintiff:
Charles Shields
Defendant:
Delta Rigging & Tools, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rentas v. The City of New York
as 14-2512
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Axel Rentas
Defendant:
Correction Officer Richard Serrano, Shield No. 2037, in his Official Capacity, City of New York, Correction Officers John Doe, #1-10, Individually and in their Official Capacities and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Captain John Ruffin, Sheild No. 488, Individually and in his Official Capacity
Rentas v. The City of New York
as 14-2475
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Axel Rentas
Defendant:
Correction Officer Richard Serrano, Shield No. 2037, in his Official Capacity and Correction Officers John Doe, #1-10, Individually and in their Official Capacities
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Correction Officer Diana Baker, Sheild No. 13239, Individually and in her Official Capacity, Correction Officer Kevin Parker, Shield No. 15629, Individually and in his Official Capacity and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Captain John Ruffin, Sheild No. 488, Individually and in his Official Capacity
Cadenhead, et al v Prospect Mortgage, LLC
as 1:2013cv01186
Plaintiff:
Larry Cadenhead , Bladimir Fisher , Lewis Hibbs and others
Defendant:
Prospect Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Vision Service Plan v. Shields et al
as 3:2011cv00396
Plaintiff:
Vision Service Plan
Defendant:
William Shields , Charles Shields and Shields & Shields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Charles Shield
as 08-1506
Not Party - Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES SHIELDS
Not Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
