Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Weimer v. Smith, et al
as 23-6115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD WEIMER
Defendant / Appellee:
FRED COLSON SMITH, JR., CHARLES WHITTINGTON, INAS YACOUB and others
WHITTINGTON v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WHITTINGTON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC, SAMUEL BYRD, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weimer v. Smith et al
as 5:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Weimer
Defendant:
Fred Colson Smith, Charles Whittington, Inas Yacoub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITTINGTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11142
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WHITTINGTON JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whittington v. Walgreen Co.
as 2:2020cv00600
Plaintiff:
Charles Whittington
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Whittington v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00199
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Charles Whittington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHITTINGTON et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al
as 1:2010cv00046
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WHITTINGTON and JAN WHITTINGTON
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, AFFILIATED CLAIMS SERVICE, INC., BENO AND ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Whittington et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al
as 1:2010cv00047
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Affiliated Claims Service, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Whittington, Charles Whittington, Jan Whittington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
