Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Lewis v. Colvin
as 6:2016cv06411
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Lewis
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perez v. Riverfront Medical, P.C., et al
as 5:2014cv00770
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Riverfront Medical, P.C., Cheryl Lewis and Riverfront Medical, P.C. 401(K) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lewis v. AB&I Foundry et al
as TNE/1:13-cv-00394
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Lewis
Defendant:
AB&I Foundry , Tyler Pipe Company , McWane, Inc. and others
Lewis v. AB&I Foundry et al
as 1:2013cv00394
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Lewis
Defendant:
AB&I Foundry, Tyler Pipe Company, McWane , Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheryl Lewis et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 1:2012cv00803
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Lewis and Carl Wayne Lewis
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Clifford Lewis, et al v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 11-17301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD M. LEWIS, DONALD D. LEWIS, BOB MALDANADO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, CLARENCE JONES, (now deceased) whose Indian heir, assign, executor, administrator or successor in interest is Lorie Jones, LESTER BURROUGH and others
Cheryl Lewis et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 2:2011cv03146
Plaintiff:
Carl Wayne Lewis and Cheryl Lewis
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
