Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WERTZ et al v. INMATE CALLING SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WERTZ and PATRICK HUGHEY
Defendant:
INMATE CALLING SOLUTIONS, LLC, JEFFREY FEWELL, CHRIS CAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Klosterman v. Sedamsville Community Development Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv00119
Defendant:
Lonnie Wise, Patricia A. Burke, Mayor John Cranley and others
Plaintiff:
John Klosterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Cain
as 16-3950
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Cain, Jr., Jamie Soha and Patrick Ackroyd
Defendant - Appellant:
Chris Cain
In Re: Cain v. United States of America
as 16-2925
Petitioner:
Chris Cain
Respondent:
United States of America
Cain v. USA
as 1:2014cv00591
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Chris Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Joseph Consonery, Jr. v. Joseph Pelzer, et al
as 13-1738
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSEPH CONSONERY, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
NURSE ESTHER, CAPTAIN MICHAEL KING, WARDEN JOSEPH PELZER and others
Cain v. Stresscrete, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv01296
Plaintiff:
Chris Cain
Defendant:
Stresscrete, Inc., Chris Dawley and Glenn Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CONSONERY v. PELZER et al
as 2:2009cv01510
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH W. CONSONERY, JR.
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. PELZER, EDWARD STRAWN, MICHAEL KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Covington Police Dept. et al
as 1:2009cv02784
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Moore
Defendant:
Covington Police Dept., Asher Dozier, Chris Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Moore v. Covington Police Dept. et al
as 1:2009mi00391
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Moore
Defendant:
Covington Police Dept., Asher Dozier, Chris Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
