Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Reynolds v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2026cv00762
Plaintiff:
Chris Reynolds
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doe v. Sequoia Capital
as 25-2243
Plaintiff:
AMBER DOE
Defendant:
SEQUOIA CAPITAL, ET AL., MICHAEL LEWIS GOGUEN, TWO BEAR CAPITAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
REYNOLDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20063
Plaintiff:
CHRIS REYNOLDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Amber Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 2:2023cv06439
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BAPTISTE v. VOX MEDIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02161
Plaintiff:
AMBER BAPTISTE
Defendant:
VOX MEDIA, INC., SEQUOIA CAPITAL, MICHAEL LEWIS GOGUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 1:2023cv05881
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Davis v. Kelly et al
as 6:2021cv02394
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Davis
Defendant:
Dennis Kelly, Lonnie Smith, Chris Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones, Kurtis v. Mahoney, David et al
as 3:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Deputy Shane Anderson, Sgt. Chris Reynolds and others
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Kurtis Domaine Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
