Cases 1 - 10 of 13,120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Torre v. State of California et al
as 5:2024cv05030
Plaintiff:
Robert Carmelo Torre
Defendant:
State of California, Gavin Christopher Newsom, Rob Andres Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lin v. Wray
as 24-10420
Plaintiff:
Ke-Wei Lin
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, United States Department of Justice, (CA), Chad Yarbrough and others
Boyer v. Iowa State Patrol et al
as 4:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Boyer
Defendant:
Iowa State Patrol and Alex Dinkla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Boyer et al v. Iowa State Patrol et al
as 4:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Boyer and Jessica E. Boyer
Defendant:
Iowa State Patrol and Spencer Baltes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
SHAH v. TURNER III et al
as 3:2024cv05988
Plaintiff:
PETER I. SHAH
Defendant:
JOHN G. TURNER III, PATRICIA M. KIPNIS, ELLIOTT C. MCGRAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
