Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Conley et al v. Mavis Tire Supply, LLC
as 1:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Christopher Conley, William Bryce and Samuel DeJesus
Defendant:
Mavis Tire Supply, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tracy Evanson, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 20-71761
Petitioner:
ESSENCE GUSS, SHILO ROJAS, JOURNEY ROJAS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Not Classified By Court:
CHRISTOPHER CONLEY and In re: TRACY EVANSON
Tracy Evanson et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2019cv05393
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, in their official capacity as deputy sheriffs, Christopher Conley and others
Plaintiff:
Essence Guss, Journey Rojas, Shilo Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeal et al v. Coleman et al
as 5:2019cv00050
Plaintiff:
Christopher Conley and Samquinton McNeal
Defendant:
John Little, John Daniels, John Joel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Christopher Conley
as 19-4396
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CONLEY, f/k/a Chris Conley
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
White v. City of Maysville et al
as 2:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
Tyler White
Defendant:
City of Maysville, Maysville Police Department, Christopher Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONLEY v. BERRY
as 4:2017cv00188
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER CONLEY
Respondent:
Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CONLEY v. BERRY
as 1:2017cv00146
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER CONLEY
Respondent:
BERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Angel Mendez, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 13-57072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGEL MENDEZ and JENNIFER LYNN GARCIA
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CONLEY, Deputy and JENNIFER PEDERSEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
