Cases 1 - 10 of 278
Boylan v. Wardlaw et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Timothy T Boylan, Jr
Defendant:
Brandon D Wardlaw, Adam Barnett, Timothy Distasio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ragless v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv10050
Plaintiff:
Kyle Ragless
Defendant:
Christopher Jones and Michael Olsaver
Ragless v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Kyle Ragless
Defendant:
Christopher Jones and Michael Olsaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jones v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv01416
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. UPS
as 3:2023cv02434
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
UPS
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 1463 Public Contracts: Unlawful Employment Prac
Resurrection House Ministries, Inc v. City of Brunswick et al
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Resurrection House Ministries, Inc
Defendant:
City of Brunswick, Cosby H. Johnson, Julie T. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29168
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29102
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22571
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
