Cases 1 - 10 of 19
(PC) Collins v. Logan et al
as 2:2026cv00601
Plaintiff:
Shayne Collins
Defendant:
Christopher Logan and Tehama County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Iron Mountain Incorporated
as 1:2026cv00109
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOGAN
Defendant:
Iron Mountain Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Clark v. Miller et al
as 1:2025cv00973
Plaintiff:
Christy Clark
Defendant:
Apex Foundation Specialists, LLC and Christopher Logan Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Silva v. McNamee et al
as 3:2024cv00949
Defendant:
Takemi Keizo, Brian McNamee, Mandy K. Cohen and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Logan Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Silva v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Christopher Logan Silva
Defendant:
Charles Q. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Silva v. Powell
as 3:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Christopher Logan Silva
Defendant:
Jerome Hayden Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Christopher Meadows
as 24-1937
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher Logan Meadows
USA, et al v. Wolf Creek Federal Services, Inc., et al
as 24-3022
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel, USN4U, LLC, Relator and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WOLF CREEK FEDERAL SERVICES, INC., TIMOTHY TESCH, CHRISTOPHER LOGAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. USN4U, LLC
Franks v. Danzy et al
as 3:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Christopher Logan Franks
Defendant:
Sgt. Danzy, CO 2 Scott and CO 1 Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walston et al v. Kantor et al
as 6:2021cv00893
Plaintiff:
Brittany A. Walston and Darius V. Walston
Defendant:
Christopher Logan Kantor and Eric W. Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.