Cases 11 - 20 of 128
Terry Digiovanni v. Federal Hierarchy et al
as 2:2015cv04587
Defendant:
1445 N. Boonville Avenue, 180 East Ocean Blvd., Long Beach, Los Angeles CA 90802, AA Central Offices and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Digiovanni
BRYANT v. HAGEL et al
as 5:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO BRYANT
Defendant:
CHUCK HAGEL, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stewart v. Comey et al
as 3:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Tori Stewart
Defendant:
James Comey , Michael S. Rogers , John Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LANG v. DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE et al
as 2:2015cv00128
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. LANG
Defendant:
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE, CHUCK HAGEL, DEBORAH LEE JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sigmatech Inc v. US Department of Defense et al
as 5:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
Sigmatech Inc
Defendant:
US Department of Defense , Chuck Hagel , United States Army and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-Nashir v. Barack Obama, et al
as 15-5020
Petitioner - Appellant:
Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed Al-Nashiri
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vice President of the United States, John F. Kerry, Secretary of State of the United States and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
YELDER v. HAGEL et al
as 1:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
GLORIA YELDER
Defendant:
CHUCK HAGEL, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ROBERT MINCHIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
