Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 ADA - Discrimination
Harris v. 22nd Judicial Circuit City of St. Louis Circuit Court
as 4:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Desmond Harris
Defendant:
22nd Judicial Circuit City of St. Louis Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Fitzgerald v. Alfred Siegel
as 23-135
Debtor:
In re: CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED
Petitioner:
JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III, Acting United States Trustee for Region 4
Respondent:
ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Trustee of the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust
In Re: American Express Anti-S
as 20-1766
Plaintiff:
National Supermarkets Association, Inc., on behalf of its membership, and all other similarly situated persons, Clam Lake Partners LLC, James Eaton and others
Intervenor:
Gander Mountain Company, Circuit City Liquidating Trust, Holiday Companies and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Qwik Lube LLC and LaJolla Auto Tech, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc,
Defendant:
Susan Burdette
In Re: American Express Anti-S
as 20-580
Plaintiff:
National Supermarkets Association, Inc., on behalf of its membership, and all other similarly situated persons, Clam Lake Partners LLC, James Eaton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cohen Rese Gallery, Inc., Lopez-Dejonge, Inc., Jasa, Inc., on behalf of themselves and others
Intervenor:
Circuit City Liquidating Trust, Gander Mountain Company, Holiday Companies and others
Defendant / Appellee:
American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc, and American Express Company
Defendant:
Susan Burdette
John P. Fitzgerald, III v. Alfred H. Siegel
as 19-2240
Debtor:
CIRCUIT CITY PROPERTIES, LLC, CC DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, INC., COURCHEVEL, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Trustee of the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III, Acting United States Trustee for Region 4
Alfred Siegel v. California Self-Insurers'
as 19-2223
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Solely as Trustee of the Circuit City Stores Liquidating Trust and Not in Any Individual or Other Capacity
Defendant / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA SELF-INSURERS' SECURITY FUND
Defendant:
ANDRE SCHOORL, solely in his capacity as Acting Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations
John P. Fitzgerald, III v. Alfred H. Siegel
as 19-405
Debtor:
CIRCUIT CITY PROPERTIES, LLC, CC DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, INC., COURCHEVEL, LLC and others
Respondent:
ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Trustee of the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust
Petitioner:
JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III, Acting United States Trustee for Region 4
In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III)
as 3:2017md02801
Defendant:
Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III), Panasonic Corporation, KEMET Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Chip-Tech, Ltd., Michael Brooks, Benchmark Electronics Phoenix Incorporated and others
Respondent:
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Aptiv Services US, LLC
Intervenor:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Quathimatine Holdings, Inc., HP, Inc. and Dell Inc.
Claimant:
Certain Members of Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Settlement Class
Interested Party:
Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 3:2014cv03264
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Mouser Electronics, Inc., Gossett Motor Cars, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Shizuki Electric Co., Inc., Kemet Corporation, NEC Tokin America, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Digi-Key Corporation, Quathimatine Holdings, Inc. and Five Rivers Electronic Innovations, LLC
Intervenor:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
Satoshi Okubo
Respondent:
Cambridge Capital Corporation
Interested Party:
Schuten Electronics, Inc. and Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
