Cases 51 - 60 of 163,394
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 24-1309
Petitioner:
TOWAKI KOMATSU
Respondent:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, LISA FITZPATRICK, sued in their individual and official capacities, NIGEL MARKS, sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Odquina v. City and County of Honolulu, et al.
as 24-3105
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ODQUINA
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU and ANNE E. LOPEZ, in her Official Capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
Barlow v. Town of Colorado City
as 24-3118
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR E. BARLOW
Defendant:
TOWN OF COLORADO CITY, an Arizona Municipal Corporation
Jermaine Capel v. City of Norfolk
as 24-1437
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE M. CAPEL
Defendant:
CITY OF NORFOLK, CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION and others
v. The City of Elko et al
as 3:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
The City of Elko
Defendant:
Ville 837 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Knott v. The City of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Eva Knott
Defendant:
The City of San Diego, Police Chief David Nisleit and Lieutenant Adam Sharki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Peet et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Peet, Sr. and Audrea Rachelle Peet
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Greg Turnbow, Jonathan Douglass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Singleton v. Nashville Police Dept. et al
as 2:2024cv02332
Plaintiff:
Timothy Singleton
Defendant:
Nashville Police Dept., City of Nashville, Tennessee State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
