Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Level 10 Focus, Inc. et al v. Rice et al
as 1:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Level 10 Focus, Inc. and Level 10 Focus Ltd.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Rice and Flower City Fitness, LLC doing business as Coach Your ADHD Brain
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Carmencita Pedro v. City Fitness LLC, et al
as 21-1430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARMENCITA MARIA PEDRO
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY FITNESS LLC, STEPHANIE STOYER, EDITA ZLATIC-STUCKEY and others
Defendant:
ANNE ROGERS and BOMBAY YOGA CO
PEDRO v. CITY FITNESS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03542
Plaintiff:
CARMENCITA MARIA PEDRO
Defendant:
CITY FITNESS, LLC, WHARTON STREET FITNESS, LLC, WALNUT STREET FITNESS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Non-Participating:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ANDREWS v. CITY FITNESS MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2015cv06792
Plaintiff:
JADE ANDREWS
Defendant:
CITY FITNESS MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pereyra et al v. Sedky et al
as 1:2015cv12854
Plaintiff:
Roberto Pereyra and City Fitness Group, LLC
Defendant:
Herve Sedky , KLIO, LLC , KLIO Fitness Clubs, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Transmission of Bankruptcy Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014mc00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
