Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Association of American Universities, et al v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al
as 25-1345
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES, AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION, ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., in the official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and others
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS BIOTECHNOLOGY COUNCIL, INC. and TISHUARA O. JONES, Mayor, City of St. Louis, Missouri
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS, CITY OF BOSTON, MA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICERS and others
Association of American Medical Colleges, et al v. National Institutes of Health, et al
as 25-1344
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, GREATER NEW YORK HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES OF PHARMACY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JAY BHATTACHARYA, M.D., Ph.D. in the official capacity as Director of the National Institutes of Health and others
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS BIOTECHNOLOGY COUNCIL, INC. and TISHUARA O. JONES, Mayor, City of St. Louis, Missouri
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS, CITY OF BOSTON, MA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICERS and others
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al v. National Institutes of Health, et al
as 25-1343
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DANA NESSEL, on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, JAY BHATTACHARYA, M.D., Ph.D. in the official capacity as Director of the National Institutes of Health and others
Interested Party:
CODY R. HART, DERRILL J. FUSSELL, MASSACHUSETTS BIOTECHNOLOGY COUNCIL, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICERS and others
Ohio County Commission et al v. Express Scripts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ohio County Commission, Brooke County Commission, Tyler County Commission and others
Defendant:
Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Express Scripts Pharmacy, Inc., ESI Mail Order Processing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Howell-McCallum, Shasta v. County of Rock et al
as 3:2024cv00414
Defendant:
General Motors, City of Milton, The Wisconsin Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Shasta Casey Howell and Shasta Casey Howell-McCallum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimroze Corp. et al v. City of Milton, Georgia
as 1:2024cv02538
Plaintiff:
Daryn Rosenberger, Jimroze Corp. doing business as D'Rose Vintners and James Rosenberger
Defendant:
City of Milton, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Vick v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2023cv06197
Plaintiff:
John E Vick
Defendant:
Tony Hernandez, Alexandria Hunter, Keanu Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell, Shasta v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2023cv00711
Plaintiff:
Shasta Casey Howell and Shasta Casey McCallum
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Rock County Child Protection Services, Rock County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUSSELL v. CITY OF MILTON FL
as 3:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN L RUSSELL
Defendant:
CITY OF MILTON FL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dial v. Higginbotham et al
as 3:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Caleb A. Dial
Defendant:
Keith Higginbotham, Milton Police Department, City of Milton, West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
