Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SANDERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55945
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE SANDERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders et al v. Harrison Finance Co. et al
as 2:2019cv00174
Plaintiff:
Clarence Sanders and Charolette Sanders
Defendant:
John Does 1-5 and Harrison Finance Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Clarence Sanders v. Stacy Kincade
as 15-7347
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE SANDERS
Respondent - Appellee:
STACY KINCADE, Sheriff, Fairfax County Adult Detention Center and KAREN BROWN, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board
Sherrilyn Taylor v. Richard Taylor, et al
as 15-13694
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHERRILYN TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD TAYLOR, in his individual capacity and CLARENCE SANDERS, in his individual capacity
Sherrilyn Taylor v. Richard Taylor, et al
as 15-13694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERRILYN TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD TAYLOR, in his individual capacity and CLARENCE SANDERS, in his individual capacity
Sanders v. Kincade et al
as 1:2015cv00736
Petitioner:
Clarence Sanders
Respondent:
Stacy Kincade and Karen D. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanders v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv04093
Plaintiff:
Clarence Sanders
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Sanders v. Warden
as 1:2014cv02027
Plaintiff:
Clarence Sanders
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Montgomery County Georgia et al
as 3:2014cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nathan Nichols, Jr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County Georgia, Sheriff Department of Montgomery County, Charlie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Taylor et al
as 3:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Sherrilyn Taylor
Defendant:
Richard Taylor, Clarence Sanders and Lynda Wammock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
