Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. Department of Correction et al
as 6:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
Department of Correction, CO Walker and Morning Shift at CFRC Orlando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fugate v. Fayette County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Fugate
Defendant:
Fayette County Detention Center, CO Walker and CO Emme
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Odom et al
as 5:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Antron T. Smith
Defendant:
Warden Odom, Warden Cox, Lt. Hattoway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Walker et al
as 2:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Bowen
Defendant:
CO Walker, John Doe Cert Team #1, John Doe Cert Team #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McLeod v. Inch et al
as 3:2019cv00807
Defendant:
Lt. Harlow, Mark Inch, Warden Young and others
Plaintiff:
Steven A. McLeod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cyprian v. White et al
as 3:2019cv05047
Defendant:
CO Depew, CO Coleman, CO Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Cyprian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Clarke et al
as 2:2017cv00997
Plaintiff:
Marcelus Edward Goodwin
Defendant:
David Clarke , Captain Souck, Captain Dukard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04415
Plaintiff:
Ernest Murphy
Defendant:
City of New York , Captain Pittman, #969 (first name unknown), NYC DOC Officer Sinacore, #15459 (f/n/u) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Hendrix
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, CO Lowery, CO Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baptiste v. Anderson et al
as 2:2009cv00546
Plaintiff:
Dordly Baptiste
Defendant:
CO Anderson, CO Walker, CO Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
