Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Longfrazier v. City of Aurora, et al
as 21-1288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAMARR LONGFRAZIER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF AURORA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT, FBI SURVEILLANCE TEAM and others
Longfrazier v. City of Aurora Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv03207
Defendant:
Carl Tolman, City of Denver Police Department, Shane (I) Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Shamarr Longfrazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Clark et al
as 1:2018cv01422
Plaintiff:
Tazarna Akira Bey
Defendant:
Colleen Clark, Anna M. Ollada, Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Colleen Clarke et al v. Unilever, United States, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv06856
Plaintiff:
Colleen Clarke and Robert Clarke
Defendant:
Does, Rite Aid, Inc. and Unilever, United States, Inc.
Bey v. Colleen Clark et al
as 1:2017cv01594
Plaintiff:
Zacharias Aaron Bey
Defendant:
Colleen Clark, D. Swift and 1st Class Towing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2014cv30714
Plaintiff:
Colleen Clark Norris and Johnny Ray Norris
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stocks v. Brauchler et al
as 1:2013cv03290
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stocks
Defendant:
George Brauchler, Colleen Clark and Eric White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
VI Action Group, et al v. Rupert Ross, Jr., et al
as 12-3179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VI ACTION GROUP, COLLEEN CLARKE, EVELYN BASCOMBE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RUPERT W. ROSS, JR. and ST CROIX BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
