Cases 1 - 10 of 4,564
Cortez et al v. Sterling Card Solutions Holdings, LLC
as 3:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cortez and Phillip Matoy
Defendant:
Sterling Card Solutions Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Michalski v. Purillo et al
as 1:2024cv04038
Plaintiff:
Cortez Michalski
Defendant:
Purillo, Well Path and Mike Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Napa State Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv02943
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Napa State Hospital and Fernando Cortez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Calhoun
as 6:2024cv03147
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cortez Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Cooks v. Cortez et al
as 1:2024cv03937
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cooks
Defendant:
Sheri Cortez and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cortez Jr v. Trejo Jr et al
as 1:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Armando Cortez Jr
Defendant:
Glen Trejo Jr, Officer Ceja, Granger Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cortez-Diaz v. Garland
as 24-2987
Petitioner:
DORA BEATRIZ CORTEZ-DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Lopez-Cortez v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-2889
Petitioner:
RAUL LOPEZ-CORTEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
S. SALMONSON, WARDEN
Cortez v. USA
as 2:2024cv11202
Petitioner:
Demas Hernandez Cortez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
